May 172013
 

William Constable

Winifred Constable

I recently came across a painting by an artist I had never heard of – Henry Walton. Paraphrasing his entry in the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography:

Walton was born in 1746, and was baptized on 5 January in that year at Dickleburgh, Norfolk. He was one of three children of Samuel Walton, yeoman farmer, and his wife, Ann Newstead. Father served as churchwarden and overseer of the poor. Little is known of Henry’s early schooling but the collection of books belonging to him at his death suggest that he could read Greek, Latin, and French, so presumably he had a very thorough education.

A Gentleman at Breakfast, painted in 1775

In 1765, aged nineteen, Walton moved to London, although it is not clear whether he had a trade or formal training at this stage. The first recorded painting by him was a husband-and-wife portrait dated 1768. In 1770 he enrolled at the Maiden Lane Academy, in Covent Garden, London, to study Art, and while there became a pupil of Johan Zoffany. By 1771 Walton was living at Great Chandos Street, Covent Garden, painting portraits in oil and miniatures, often featuring close friends and family. 1771 saw Walton elected a fellow of the Society of Artists, where he exhibited two portraits. In 1772 he was elected a director of the society, showing four works at that year’s exhibition. He exhibited there again in 1773 and 1776.

Thomas Inyon aged 70, painted in 1776

On 10 September 1771 Walton married Elizabeth Rust, the daughter of a wool draper and herself a miniature painter. She came from the Suffolk village of Wortham and shortly after the marriage Henry Walton purchased Oak Tree Farm, in the village of Burgate, near to Wortham, and converted one of the cottages into a house and studio. The marriage was to prove childless.

While he was initially drawn to landscapes, during the early to mid-1770s Walton seems to have concentrated on working as a portrait painter, presumably because it was easier to get commissions for these from the Suffolk gentry. He also painted Edward Gibbon on at least half a dozen occasions (including this one at the National Portrait Gallery).

 

Another was of Horatio Walpole, first earl of Orford:

 

 

 

 

 

In 1776 Walton exhibited his first genre subject, A Girl Plucking a Turkey (Tate collection), at the Society of Artists. This was followed by other genre subjects, notably A Girl Buying a Ballad (Tate collection), exhibited at the Royal Academy in 1777.

 

                                         Girl plucking a turkey, 1776

A Girl Buying a Ballad

In November 1778 Walton was turned down for membership of the Royal Academy, allegedly because of his prior connection with the rival Society of Artists. Feeling snubbed, he showed only two more works there in 1779 after which he ceased to exhibit altogether. During the 1780s Walton devoted himself increasingly to his farm in Burgate. He also travelled to Yorkshire, where he painted portraits of important local families.

 Country Maid

Country Maid

 

The Market Girl

By the early 1790s he was established as a picture dealer and adviser to some major private collectors, notably Lord Lansdowne, Lord Fitzwilliam, and Sir Thomas Beauchamp-Proctor, to whom he sold a Poussin from the collection of Sir Joshua Reynolds. Walton’s expertise was apparently such that ‘there was scarcely a picture of note in this country, with the history of which he was unacquainted’ . Walton continued to paint local Norfolk and Suffolk families well into the early 1800′s. By 1810 Walton was in poor health, having contracted a fever ‘which caused a great alteration in his appearance’. One evening in May 1813, on returning from a party to his London lodgings in New Bond Street, Walton complained of feeling ill. He was found dead in bed the next morning, the immediate cause of death being described as “hydrothorax and pleurisy” and he was buried near his parents in the churchyard at Brome, Suffolk.

Feb 112013
 

Many moons ago (was it really ten years?) I was a lawyer. So I suppose I have always been interested in the public perception of lawyers because, let’s face it, we never have had a good press!

Which is why I like this Richard Newton etching from 20th April 1796  shown courtesy of the British Museum.

 

Entitled ‘Beggar my Neighbour’ it shows the lawyer playing cards. He holds the Ace, against the King held by his country neighbour, and he has already won all the money on the table.

And the moral is: if you come up against the lawyer, he will win – even though you won’t realize that you have lost until you have nothing left.

Turning to the Lewis Walpole Library collection gives a few more  digs at the unappreciated members of the legal profession, starting with two by Robert Dighton. The first, published in 1793, has the title” The Lawyer and his agent” while the second from 1812 shows the lawyer removing a large banknote from his somewhat shell-shocked cleint :

To end with, one entitled “The Lawyers last circuit” by J Baker, published in 1820:

The description is given as:

“A fat lawyer clutching a purse is sped toward the flames of hell on a skeletal horse ridden by Death who is depicted as a skeleton carrying a scythe. A naked long-haired devil holding snakes pursues them on a snorting white horse, while in the foreground, beside a chained Cerberus, jubilant demons welcome the new arrival”.

Says it all really!

Oct 242012
 

Isabella Beetham, born Isabella Robinson (c.1744-1825) was an interesting character. She came from a wealthy family but when she was twenty she eloped with an itinerant Irish actor called Edward Beetham. Her family cut off her maintenance and she was forced to take up portraiture as a way of keeping the wolf from the door. She specialized in making paper cut-outs (what we now call silhouettes, but which were then called shades). She then studied with the London minituarist John Smart, and started to paint the silhouette of the sitter (rather than to cut it with scissors). She painted on glass as well as on paper, and some of the results are really beautiful.

Meanwhile her husband continued to work on the London stage. He also invented things – initially the roll-up weighted safety curtain to be used at theatres to prevent fire from spreading. But there was insufficient money to pay to take out a patent and the idea was soon copied by others, and he never made his fortune from it. Another invention – and one which he did patent, was called a “patent Mangle with Rollers”. Basically this was a primitive form of washing tub where the wooden rollers were kept pressed together so that the moisture in the clothes was wrung out. It was a considerable financial success and Edward was able to move in to shop premises at 26 and 27 Fleet Street in London. He sold his mangles downstairs and Isabella did her painting upstairs.

One of the things which make Isabella so collectable, and distinguishes her from the many gifted but anonymous amateurs who did paper cut-outs and painted silhouettes, was that she started backing her creations with a trade label giving her name. From around 1774 her works were backed with a splendidly verbose label of which part reads “By application leagued with Good Natural Gifts Mrs Beetham has enabled herself to remedy a Difficulty Much lamented and Universally Experienced by PARENTS, LOVERS AND FRIENDS.The former, assisted by her Art, may see their offspring In any part of the Terraqueous Globe. Nor can Death obliterate the features from their fond Remembrance. LOVERS the Poets have advanced, ‘Can waft a sigh from Indus to the Pole. She will gratify them with more substantial though Ideal Intercourse by placing the Beloved Object to their View. FRIENDSHIP is truly valuable was ever held a Maxim.…”

OK, so that is a bit over the top, but at least it means her works can be identified!

An advertisement, published in 1792, read:

PROFILES:  Mrs. BEETHAM, who has ever been distinguished as one of the most eminent who ever attempted PROFILE LIKENESSES, continues to execute them with that Taste and Elegance which remains unrivalled. She paints them on Chrystals, ornamented with gold and silver, displaying the hair and drapery in a manner more beautiful than can be conceived till seen: and if not the most striking likeness, no gratuity will be expected. She likewise finishes them on IVORY, COMPOSITION, AND PAPER, for RINGS, LOCKETS, BRACELETS, &c.

Time of Sitting, One Minute

Specimens to be seen at her house, no. 27, Fleet Street”.

In the early 1790s, the Beetham’s oldest daughter, Jane, began working with her mother, and continued to do so until she got married in 1797. A label from that period noted that “Mrs. And Miss BEETHAM” were creating “PROFILE LIKENESSES.” Jane  exhibited several of her works at the Royal Academy between 1794 and 1816, sometimes using the name ‘Beetham’, sometimes dropping an ‘e’ and calling herself ‘Betham’ and occasionally using her married name of ‘Read’

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

And, just in case I am accused of bias by not showing any male sitters, here are a couple of her portraits of  two splendid-looking gentlemen, courtesy of Bonhams auction house.

    

 

 

 

(For the biographical information I am indebted to an article by Joy Ruskin Hanes  in the New England Antiques Journal)

 

Oct 112012
 

A quick follow-on from yesterday’s post to show a rather lovely commentary on obesity. The background is that Frederick I, King of Württemberg, married Charlotte, the Princess Royal (eldest  daughter of King George III) in 18th May 1797. It was his second marriage, since his first wife died in 1788.

The cartoon is by Richard Newton and shows the grotesquely large Frederick approaching his consort, while  a black slave supports his protruding belly. A carpenter has cut a hole in the dining table so that the King can reach his dinner, and makes the crude comment that he wonders “How the King will reach [the Queen], God only knows. Perhaps he has some German method…”

In fact the print hardly  exaggerates: the king was huge. Wikipedia has him as being at 2.11 m (6 ft 11 in) tall  and weighing about 200 kg (440 lb). Frederick had been given the nick-name “The Great Belly-Gerent”. Napoleon apparently remarked that God had created the Prince to demonstrate the utmost extent to which the human skin could be stretched without bursting. In return, Frederick wondered how so much poison could fit in such a small head as Napoleon’s. Ouch!

Poor Charlotte…. the German Method may have worked but the resulting daughter was stillborn  (1798) and she was widowed in 1816. She died in 1828.

 

 

 

 

The King in full ceremonial garb.

Oct 102012
 

Newton, self portrait

My post is on a splendid artist called Richard Newton who had his first drawing published when he was 13 or 14 and then proceeded to produce pictures at the rate of at least one a week for the next seven years. By the time he was 21 he had nearly 300 of his works published. Many of them are youthful, sometimes scurrilous, often irreverent, and are occasionally brilliant cartoons.

Let me start with his drawing of the inside of William Holland’s print shop, bedecked with prints (some of them recognizably by Newton himself). It is shown courtesy of the Brtish Museum.

Why? Because William Holland published works which were considered seditious (Rights of Man) and was in prison in 1793, leaving the young Newton to run the shop for him.

Despite being kept busy running the shop he nevertheless landed useful commissions, including one to illustrate Laurence Sterne’s Sentimental Journey through France and Italy (1795). He was later involved in providing illustrations to Tom Jones by Henry Fielding.

Richard Newton had been born in 1777. Some of his earliest works were drawings of George III – in particular having a dig at the royal low-brow taste in theatrical entertainment as here, where the King considers it appropriate to study clowns in close detail. They in turn inspect the monarch (hence the title of “Rival Clowns”). This was part of a series of prints showing the King’s  lack of good taste.

Richard also drew a number of anti-slavery caricatures as well as a series about the characters he met on his prison visits (i.e. when visiting Holland in Newgate). He moved around London – the British Museum site lists his addresses in Great Portland Street, (November 1791 to December 1792) 26 Wallbrook (the address given on prints published in 1794) Brydges Street, London (three houses in this street near Drury Lane belonged to Newton’s father, where Richards lived from early 1797 onwards, apparently sharing the house with the Hixon family, copperplate printers).

The youthful artist was not averse to puns (as in this picture entitled Night Mare). A man awakes to find a demon sitting on his wife in bed, smoking a pipe. At the window the ‘night mare’ makes an appearance.

 

 

See also “A peep into Brest with a navel review”

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The lad also liked lavatorial humour as in “Treason”, and in “John Bull in Paris between a shower and a stink”.

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fashions were ridiculed as in Tippers of 1796, as were the ogling males in Madame Parisot.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I rather like his picture of the barber’s shop; in “Shave for a penny” the poor guy in the chair gets cut by the barber, who has been distracted by the man calling round to collect spare hair with which to make wigs.

Richard’s prodigious and bawdy output included these three prophetic cartoons showing Death: the irony is that at the age of 21 death did indeed come knocking at his door. He died of typhoid (popularly known as jail fever) in 1798. It was a huge loss to the world of satire, because here was a man with a big talent.

,

 

Oct 052012
 

Today’s post is a taster – a group of engravings by 18th Century artist John Collier, about whom I will do a blog shortly.

Suffice to say he lived between 1708 and 1786, dying just before the huge popularity of caricatures towards the end of the century. He used the nom de plume Tim Bobbin and amongst other things he did a delightful series on going to the dentist. For some obscure reason my wife’s niece, who runs a splendid dental practice in Exeter, chooses not to line her waiting room with prints of these!

The first, entitled Acute Pain shows a gleeful person inflicting pain on the unfortunate guy with a rotten tooth, extracting it with a piece of string.

Here are two oil on board paintings, described as being “after John Collier” in each case showing a Blacksmith using a pair of pliers to pull  a tooth from an un-lovely patient (victim?).

I like this image of a dentist waving a hot coal in the face of the patient to cause him to jerk backwards so as to tug out the tooth. Why waste time on analgesics when you can terrify your patient?

Sadism is even more apparent in this one, showing the dentist with his foot on the patient’s chest so as to get the necessary leverage. Who wouldn’t want to visit a dentist who takes such obvious delight in his trade?!

Here is another variation on the plier theme, with the patient’s spouse watching with concerned concentration as the dentist goes about his business. Suddenly, the pain where my filling has come loose no longer seems worth bothering about….

The images are all shown courtesy of the Wellcome Library in London.

Aug 172012
 
Oscar Wilde, in The Importance of being Earnest, extols the benefits of having a Bunbury, but I wonder how real life Bunbury’s reacted to hearing that their name was synonymous with a “fictitious excuse for making a visit or avoiding an obligation” (O.E.D)?

One Bunbury who I suspect might have been amused was the lovely Henry William Bunbury, born in 1750. His father was the 5th Baronet (Sir William Bunbury of Mildenhall, Suffolk) so he can be said to have been born with a silver spoon in his mouth (if not with a whole canteen of silverware).

After completing his studies at Cambridge University (St. Catherines College) he began to draw caricatures and other comic subjects, the first of which were etched and published in 1771. Not for him the scatological, virulent political satire of Gillray or even Thomas Rowlandson (who was a close friend of his) – more a gentle dig at the world and its foibles. Many of his friends were the subject of his gentle satire and remained on good terms with him because they could see that no malice was intended.

All Fours

The Breakfast, showing the hounds eager to go a-hunting while their masters show signs of drowsiness and seem reluctant to leave the dinner table…

Boswell and Dr Johnson at a chop-house, 1781

Love and wind

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Me, My Wife and Daughter

He was a good artist – he exhibited at least once at the Royal Academy, and did the usual Grand Tour on the continent before coming back to England to try his hand at a spot of soldiering. He was captain of the West Suffolk Militia, and used his artistic talents to record their activities and in particular their horsemanship.

 

 

 

He enjoyed the patronage of the Frederick, Duke of York (he was appointed his Equerry in 1787) and was an adept mover through the fashionable salons of London Society. He was Groom of the Bedchamber to one of the younger royals, and was generally well-liked and highly successful with his drawings, many of which were adapted as etchings by Rowlandson.

Hail Storm

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tooth extraction

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Bird-Cage.

He was particularly liked for his series entitled A Long Minuet as Danced at Bath published in 1787. The finished engraving was printed on a piece of paper five feet long, and consisted of a comic-strip of dancing couples, some elegant, some ungainly, as they minuet across the pages. It is presumably this paper roll which Bunbury is shown holding in the portrait (by Thomas Lawrence) at the start of this blog. This is probably a sketch for one of the scenes:

Pictures of riders were a favourite of Bunbury and in the same year (1787) he decided to have printed “An Academy for Grown Horsemen, containing the completest instructions for walking, trotting, cantering, galloping, stumbling and tumbling. Illustrated with copper plates, and adorned with a portrait of the Author.”  He chose to do this under a pseudonym, namely “Geoffrey Gambado”. I find his pictures charming, warm, and beautifully observed.

Catherine Horneck 1753 - 1799

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As a twenty one year old he had married Catherine, the daughter of Captain Kane William Horneck, and Catherine bore him two sons. He died on 7 May 1811. He will never be as famous as Hogarth or Gillray, but his gentle poking of fun at the world around him is a real pleasure to see.

 

Aug 102012
 

Today marks the death of Scottish-born Allan Ramsay  228 years ago. As a twenty year old Ramsey had travelled from his native Edinburgh, first to London and then to Italy, to hone his skills as a painter. On the left is his  portrait as a twenty year old, courtesy of the National Gallery Complex in Edinburgh, and right, a later self-portrait courtesy of the National Portrait Gallery.

 

 

In 1761 he was appointed Principal Painter in Ordinary to George III – a job which necessitated him painting large numbers of portraits of the monarch and his family, to present to ambassadors and other dignitaries. Sounds like a real poisoned chalice to me….

King George III painted in 1762

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Queen Charlotte, painted the same year.

 

 

His private life was not particularly happy – his first wife died in childbirth and none of their three children reached adult-hood. He re-married in 1752, his bride being one of his drawing pupils called Margaret Lindsay. They had eloped together, following opposition from her family. She died in 1782.

 

 

Ramsay’s first wife Anne

 

 

 

              and second wife Margaret.

 

 

 

 

Ramsay suffered ill health and was forced to give up painting shortly after 1770, having shattered his right arm in an accident. He died aged seventy in 1784.

I particularly like this portrait of Lady Mary Coke, with its acres of white satin.

 

 

 

 

and also thus striking portrait  of Jean Abercromby, Mrs Morison of Haddo, painted around  1767.

 

 

So, let us raise a glass of Irn Bru and toast the health of Allan Ramsay – happy birthday!

 

 

(A modified version of this post first appeared on my Posterous site in 2011)

Jul 292012
 

Once in a blue moon I think it is a good idea to leave the comfort of the Eighteenth Century and visit the present time: in this case it means a blog on a splendid exhibition of sculptures which has been taking place this month in the cloisters of the Cathedral at Chichester.

For those not familiar with Chichester it is a city on the South coast, largely contained within its original Roman walls. Streets running through the North, South, West and East gates converge on the old market buttercross in the centre of the city – a cross which for some reason carries a black effigy of a figure wearing a crown. It looks a bit like Charles Ist to me but the cross is a century earlier – no doubt someone will enlighten me!

I was in Chichester on a wet blustery day when I stumbled across the exhibition at the Cathedral – made all the more remarkable because I was the only person in the cloisters. It was a curiously powerful feeling to experience the statues ‘in private’ – some have a lovely sense of movement, others a hint of menace and hidden power.

Some are decidedly Georgian, as in Mr Bennet’s daughter,

 

 

 

 

 

while others are positively medieval in their feel (as in Exultate Jubilate)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I particularly liked this one entitled Gale Force Nun:

Another memorable sculpture entitled The Last Ball of Summer shows a woman about to step out of her ball-gown – the gold ribbon, lacing her in at the back, dangling undone.

The sculptures are the work of renowned artist Philip Jackson, who lives and works in West Sussex.

Here are a few more:

Conclave

 

Moonstruck

The Musician

 

 

The Magistrate

Jul 222012
 

If you enter the pantheon of great cartoonists of the “Long Eighteenth Century” you expect to find Hogarth, Gillray, and Rowlandson. But in the corner  there has to be room for a man who died at the ridiculously early age of 28, and yet who produced some splendidly scurrilous cartoons aimed at the Royal Family – and in particular at Queen Caroline, consort of George IV.

That man is Theodore Lane and he was born in 1800 at Isleworth, in Middlesex.  He was largely self taught as an artist, although he must have received encouragement from his father, who had been a drawing master at Worcester. At 14 he was apprenticed to the minature painter John Barrow at Battle Bridge. He studied watercolour portraits and miniatures, exhibiting at the Royal Academy from 1819. He  eventually  approached Pierce Egan ( a writer of articles on the London scene) with half a dozen sketches entitled Life of an Actor  and these were published in 1824.

There followed a series of etchings and woodcuts on sporting themes. Here are a few:

Rackets at King’s Bench Prison

 

 

Wallace the Lion fights Tinker and Ball in the factory yard in the town of Warwick

He also painted in oils and exhibited on at least two occasions at the Royal Academy (in 1827 and 1828) – including this one entitled The Enthusiast  (or, The Gouty Angler).

But for my money I rate the man for his splendid cartoons poking fun at Queen Caroline (originally Caroline of Brunswick-Wolfenbüttel, wife of George IV). She, poor dear, was treated monstrously by George IV (including being banished from his coronation) but for her part she was hardly blameless and had reputedly lived openly in exile with her Italian lover Bartolomeo Pergami. Lane delighted in portraying the Queen as an object of derision – fat, short and extremely ugly. Pergami as the be-whiskered lover is made to look idiotic. Great stuff! The etchings are all © National Portrait Gallery, London.

Dignity!

The Saint!

Installation of a Knight Companion of the Bath

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Knight Companion being installed in the Bath was done at a time when a Commission had been set up to consider whether the Queen was in an adulterous relationship with Pergami; representatives had travelled to Italy where the couple were living, and servants were bribed to give information (hence the two figures watching the scene from behind the half-closed door).

And to finish this particular series, Lane’s take on the Queen’s attempt to ‘gatecrash’ the Royal coronation, which took place in 1821:

These pictures ridiculing Caroline were all exhibited for sale at the print shop of George Humphrey, as in this picture of the shop by Theodore Lane entitled ‘Honi soit qui mal y pense’ (the motto of the Royal Order of the Garter).

All was going swimmingly well for the young cartoonist: he was a sociable chap who was always to be found in some coffee house or another, often in the company of journalists, actors, and sportsmen. Then one day (21 May 1828) Theodore accidentally fell through a skylight at the Horse Bazaar in Gray’s Inn Lane, smashing the back of his head against the pavement. I have no idea why he was walking across the skylight, but the accident was fatal. He was buried a week later at Old St. Pancras Church leaving behind a wife and two children.

A tragic shame – he would have had a field day with Prince Albert and Queen Victoria had he lived!

(P.S. To finish with, two more anti-Caroline cartoons, the one in colour by Lane entitled An Armfull of Love shows the diminutive Queen standing on a stool to pucker up to to her ludicrous suitor , and the other by Cruikshank  called The Long and the Short of the Tale’ ridiculing the difference in height in much the same way).

(P.P.S. My special thanks to Anita Renaud for gently pointing out that in its original form this post had muddled Queen Charlotte (wife of George III) with Queen Caroline (estranged wife of George IV).  I was always hopeless at girls’ names….)